- Bloomberg
Billionaire Sam Zell said he is entering the real estate markets in Colombia and India in the next two weeks as he continues to favor international investments over U.S. property deals.
Zell, chairman of Chicago-based Equity International, will invest in real estate in Colombia and will eventually move on to residential projects, he said in an interview today on Bloomberg Television. In India, he plans to open hotels.
“Colombia is the next star of Latin America,” Zell said on “In the Loop” with Betty Liu. “In India, we’re doing a hotel/motel program like Residence Inn at Marriott and we hope to build a chain across the country.”
Technorati Tags: india, colombia, real estate
Popularity: 2% [?]
trying to bring more transactions under the purview of the taxman
iNewsOne
In India cash still continues to be the predominant payment mode. This can be gauged from the fact that value of bank notes and coins in circulation as a percentage of narrow money is very high at 60.07 percent for the year 2009-10 as compared to 18.51 percent in South Africa, 18.83 percent in China and 39.14 percent in Mexico.
Popularity: 2% [?]
livemint.com
Commerce secretary Rahul Khullar will lead a business delegation of engineering companies to Colombia and Panama on a five-day visit from Monday, “with an eye to explore the possibility of bilateral trade agreements” with the Latin American nations and to encourage India’s trade and investment in the region, a commerce ministry official said, requesting anonymity.
“Colombia and Panama are crucial for us as we are aiming to increase our trade ties with the Andean Community of Latin American countries,” the official said. The Andean Community is a customs union comprising the South American countries of Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru.
India already has a preferential trade agreement (PTA) with the Mercosur bloc comprising Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay and Paraguay that came into effect in 2009 and covers around 900 products. A similar trade pact with Chile has been effective since 2007.
Exports to Latin American countries rose 72.5% in 2010-11 to $10.7 billion (Rs.49,327 crore), according to latest commerce ministry data. However, India shares a trade deficit of $3.2 billion with the continent, with imports growing at 34% to $14 billion during the same year.
Technorati Tags: india, latin america, trade
Popularity: 2% [?]
News from BusinessGreen
The Brazilian authorities have this week confirmed that wind power in the country currently costs less than natural gas, after a series of energy auctions saw wind farm operators undercut other forms of energy generation.
Seventy-eight wind power projects won contracts in last week’s energy auctions held by Brazil’s National Electric Power Agency, totalling 1,928MW and priced at approximately 99.5 reals (£37.4) per MWh.
By comparison, the average price for power generated with natural gas is currently 103 reals (£38.7) per MWh in Brazil, while the average price for energy determined through the auctions was 102.07 reals per MWh. According to Brazil’s Energy Research Company (EPE), wind power is also now trading around 19 per cent cheaper per MWh than the average price in Brazil last year, suggesting the price of the technology is becoming a more competitive.
Technorati Tags: brazil, wind energy
Popularity: 1% [?]
Seeking Alpha
Goldman Sachs, in a recent report, estimates the aggregate gap between the BRICs and the G6 in electricity, telecoms, and rails as approximately $10 trillion. This is more than twice the BRIC’s current GDP, and the closing of this gap could last 25 years. The four countries are similar only in their need for increased infrastructure spending. Using World Bank data, India appears to be the least developed, lagging the other three in mobile phones, per capita electricity consumption, and access to sanitation facilities.

In addition to the immense need for increased spending, companies within the sector can rely on a portion of their revenues even during harsh economic times. Since a portion of government spending must be budgeted to maintain sanitation and transportation network, the infrastructure space is somewhat insulated from economic volatility. High barriers to entry and often nationalistic favoritism to domestic companies help to argue the case for investment.
Brazil’s build out to host the World Cup in 2014 and the Olympics in 2016 could still drive significant gains in the sector within the country. Thus far, bottlenecks and poor planning have plagued the country’s hopes to be ready. Of the estimated $20.9 billion needed in infrastructure spending, only about $3.3 billion has been invested as of April 2011. To help with the drive, the government has begun a process of privatization for three of the 66 state-owned airports. The three airports: Sao Paulo, Campinas, and Brasilia account for approximately 43% of the estimated airport infrastructure spending needed.
Technorati Tags: india, brazil, infrastructure
Popularity: 2% [?]
By Lester R. Brown | Foreign Policy
the largest food bubbles are in India and China. In India, where farmers have drilled some 20 million irrigation wells, water tables are falling and the wells are starting to go dry. The World Bank reports that 175 million Indians are being fed with grain produced by overpumping.
IN THIS ERA OF TIGHTENING world food supplies, the ability to grow food is fast becoming a new form of geopolitical leverage (DR – an OPEC for foodgrains is not a farfetched possibility), and countries are scrambling to secure their own parochial interests at the expense of the common good.
This January [2011], a new stage in the scramble among importing countries to secure food began to unfold when South Korea, which imports 70 percent of its grain, announced that it was creating a new public-private entity that will be responsible for acquiring part of this grain. With an initial office in Chicago, the plan is to bypass the large international trading firms by buying grain directly from U.S. farmers. As the Koreans acquire their own grain elevators, they may well sign multiyear delivery contracts with farmers, agreeing to buy specified quantities of wheat, corn, or soybeans at a fixed price. [DR - I have talked to large grain buyers in India and the Middle East who are eager to adopt such a model, buying cost-plus from farmers]
Technorati Tags: food, geopolitics, food security
Popularity: 4% [?]
In Latin America, the soft power Indian gurus exert over the literati and intelligentsia is considerable.
With most Indian business houses controlled by families, this affords a natural affinity for Latam business groups with similar ownership structures. Given survey results, Indian business has better long-term prospects in mostly democratic Latin America than in authoritarian African countries.
Sadanand Dhume in WSJ.com
Earlier this month, the industrialist Anand Mahindra donated $10 million
to support the teaching of the humanities Harvard, the
largest gift to the program in the university’s 374-year history. Barely
two weeks later, the $70 billion salt-to-steel Tata Group plonked down
$50 million for Harvard Business School, the biggest international
donation since the school’s founding. In recent years, Indian corporate largesse has also benefited, among others, Yale, Cornell and the University of Pennsylvania. But these gifts also illustrate a broader phenomenon: India’s growing soft power.
The most obvious signs are hard to miss. In recent years, Bollywood-themed dances have invaded wedding celebrations from Sydney to San Francisco. In Britain, curry houses employ more than 100,000 people and generate about £3.5 billion ($5.5 billion) of business each year. And if Yoga Journal is to be believed, an estimated 15.8 million Americans can tell a corpse pose from a downward-facing dog. Indian-born CEOs head such iconic global companies as PepsiCo, Citigroup and MasterCard. In the arts, reports of Indian writers scooping up literary prizes and directors helming big ticket-movies in Hollywood have almost become commonplace.
Scholars and journalists alike tend to make much of China’s vaunted “charm offensive.” It turns out, however, that when it comes to winning hearts and minds—at least democratic hearts and minds—China’s top down state-led model is not much of a match for India’s decentralized private effort.
In terms of goodwill, India bests China in both Western and Eastern democracies. For instance, according to a poll released last month by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Americans place India in the same ballpark as long-term allies South Korea and Israel. China elicits only about as much warmth as Venezuela and Mexico.
A recent BBC World Service poll of 28 countries says more or less the same thing. On average, more than half of Americans, Britons and Canadians feel “mainly positive” about India; only about one in six feel “mainly negative.” With China the numbers are reversed. Barely one in three from the Anglophone countries feel mostly positive about the Middle Kingdom; for more than four in 10 the emotions evoked are negative. Similarly, more Japanese, Indonesians and South Koreans feel positively than negatively toward India; with China it’s the opposite. Read the rest of this entry »
Popularity: 5% [?]
“If America had a central bank chief like Y. V. Reddy, the U.S. economy would not have been such a mess,” Joseph E. Stiglitz, the economist and Nobel laureate, has said. In India, there were no subprime loans.
Part of the reason is cultural. Indians are simply not as comfortable
with credit as Americans. “A lot of Indians, when you push them, will
say that if you spend more than you earn you will get in trouble,” an
Indian consultant told me. “Americans spent more than they earned.”
“Savings are important. Joint families exist. When one son
moves out, the family helps them. So you don’t borrow so much from the
bank.”
Real Time Economics – WSJ
Why did China, India and Brazil all emerge so much more rapidly from the global financial crisis than advanced economies did? In a presentation in Denver to the National Association for Business Economics, Nobel Prize-winning economist Michael Spence, now of New York University, offered several reasons:
* These economies learned bitter lessons in the 1997-98 crisis that afflicted them more than advanced economies.
* They were in “a good initial position” with relatively low leverage, and thus didn’t get hit with the severe “balance sheet recession” that hit the U.S.
* They hadn’t any complex securitized financial instruments.
* They had built up large foreign-exchange reserves.
* Their central banks responded, much as advanced countries’ central banks did, with speed and agility to the credit tightening.
* Their economic managers displayed “a high degree of competence.”
“Is this sustainable? Will they keep growing? I think the answer is a qualified yes,” he said. “I wouldn’t have said that 10 years ago.”
Adding to the sustainability of growth in emerging markets are two other
factors, he said: One, they are increasingly trading with each other
and thus are less dependent on now slow-growing advanced economies; two,
they have become rich enough for their consumers to buy the goods they
produce.
Popularity: 5% [?]